The linguistic interpretation indicates that the subject of the causative action in both forms of committing the crime specified in Art. section of the Act of June , , Industrial Property Law consolidated text: Journal of Laws of , item , as amended are simultaneously - a product and a trademark, but in an integral functional connection. It is prohibited to mark goods with a counterfeit trademark or a registered mark without authorization to use it, or to trade in goods marked with such marks. It follows that the sanctioned standard in both its forms is fulfilled no earlier than before a counterfeit or registered trademark is applied to the product but without the right to use it. However, this provision does not penalize counterfeiting a trademark or trading in a counterfeit trademark.

Preparatory activities. Such behavior cannot therefore be considered punishable Article § of the Penal Code . An philippines photo editor extended interpretation of the provisions of substantive criminal law is not permitted, and norms penalizing specific behaviors are established while the legislator respects the principle of ultima ratio, which characterizes the function of criminal law [cf. Judgment of the Supreme Court - Criminal Chamber of February.



IMPORTANT - anyone who does not have the right to use a given trademark may be the perpetrator and may be subject to a fine ranging from PLN to PLN , or imprisonment or restriction of liberty from months to years. Industrial property law – what is an offense? The appearance of protection Pursuant to the provisions of Art. Industrial property rights: Whoever, for the purpose of placing on the market, marks items not protected by a patent.